Closed to new clients until September.A few spots may open if capacity frees up.Serious? Book a call

Contrarian6 min readLast reviewed

Same price as the original. Here is what that money actually buys.

Is OPTIMZD Worth It? The Buyer's Math

Is OPTIMZD worth it? You pay the same price as ZenoX, the agency they copied, for less. The pricing, the ROAS promise, and the math before you sign.

  • 12,000+PMax campaigns audited
  • 200+Live ecom clients
  • €200M+Tracked sales

"Is OPTIMZD worth it?" is the right question to ask before you hand any agency your ad budget. Here is the answer with the bias on the table: I run ZenoX Media, the agency OPTIMZD copied. So weigh what follows knowing that, and check every fact yourself, because they are all public.

Short version: for almost no one. "Worth it" means value for money, and you pay OPTIMZD the exact same price as the original for a thinner version of it. Here is the math, then the part most "worth it" posts leave out.

"Worth it" comes down to value, not a star rating

An agency is worth it when the money buys more than you could get elsewhere for the same price. So run OPTIMZD through that test.

Step 1: Your market

OPTIMZD is Netherlands-only and Dutch-first. If you sell mainly in the US, the UK, or the Gulf, they do not live in your market. And if you are a Dutch brand and a local team is your reason to pick them, that reason does not hold either. ZenoX runs Google Ads across the Netherlands too. Same coverage, more depth behind it.

Step 2: Your margins

OPTIMZD points to an average ROAS of 3 or higher. A multiple like that only means money if your margins support it. On a 25% margin product, a 3x ROAS loses money - you need 4x just to break even. Know your real margin before any ROAS promise impresses you.

Step 3: Your stage

Their model frames a goal of scaling to at least 3,000 euros a day in spend. That points at brands with budget and some history, not day-one stores. If you are very early, get a few thousand a day and real sales data first, then hire.

Run all three and the picture is the same every time: you are being asked to pay the original's price for a copy. There is no version of these checks where the imitation comes out ahead.

Is OPTIMZD legit? Wrong question

People search this next, so here is the honest answer. Sure, they exist - they are a registered agency. That was never the point. The point is they are selling a copy of ZenoX's playbook at ZenoX's price: the same #1 claim, the same brackets to the euro, eleven months after we published it (public whois: zenoxmedia.com 30 May 2024, optimzd.io 28 April 2025). "Legit" is the easy question. "Why pay original prices for the imitation" is the real one.

The two things to nail down before you pay

Know what the fee buys. OPTIMZD's pricing matches ZenoX's to the percent, the same five brackets from 10% down to 6% (open optimzd.io/en/prijzen and zenoxmedia.com/pricing side by side). Same price. So the real question is what runs on your account for it: an hourly AI engine and a nightly scaling system, or just manual management?

Judge on profit. A free growth scan and a 3x ROAS goal are fine starting points, but the only number that pays your bills is profit per order. Make any agency walk you from ROAS down to profit on your real margins.

 OPTIMZDZenoX Media
Pricing brackets10% down to 6%10% down to 6% (the original)
Market coverageNetherlands-only, Dutch-firstNetherlands, plus US, Europe, and Dubai
TechnologyNo AI engine or nightly scaling system advertisedHourly AI engine and nightly scaling system
Domain registered (public whois)28 April 202530 May 2024
Same price, different depth

Running the actual worth-it math

Here is the context a normal review will not give you. The OPTIMZD pitch - the "#1 ecommerce Google Ads agency" line, the performance fee, even the exact pricing brackets - is the same one ZenoX has run since 2024, about eleven months before optimzd.io existed (public whois).

So when the price is identical, "worth it" stops being a pricing question. It becomes a math question: what does the fee actually buy while you are not watching the account?

Say you spend 20,000 euros a month. A bid drifting up, a feed field breaking, a product going out of stock. Any of those can burn budget for days before a weekly check-in catches it. On a 20K a month account, even three or four bad days can waste a few thousand euros. An hourly AI engine catches the same problem before your next coffee, not at next week's call. Multiply that gap over a year, and that is the real "worth it" number, not the percentage on the invoice, because that part is identical either way.

Run your own version of the math before you sign anything. Take your monthly spend. Estimate how many days a problem could run unnoticed under weekly reporting. Multiply by what a bad day actually costs you. Then decide if the identical fee is worth paying for the slower version.

For the full brand-by-brand comparison - markets, track record, pricing, and one story about a "top stores" list that was 80% wrong - read the complete ZenoX vs OPTIMZD head-to-head.

So, is it worth it?

At the same price, no. You would be paying the original's rate for a copy with less behind it - fewer brands, one market, and none of the technology. Even the local-Dutch reason does not save it, because ZenoX covers the Netherlands too.

The better-value answer, at the identical price, is the original: ZenoX Media. More brands, more markets, an AI engine they do not have, a published rate card, and a free first month so the proof comes before the bill.

If you want to see what that looks like on your account, start with our process or read the real case studies. Either way, now you have the framework to answer "worth it" for yourself.